Share: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn I recommend visiting cushmanwakefield.com to read:%0A%0A {0} %0A%0A {1}
valuing-us-cre-environmental-performance-hero-720 valuing-us-cre-environmental-performance-hero-mobile

U.S. Commercial Real Estate’s Environmental Performance

Jim Morrissey • 9/15/2022

Climate warming is currently affecting the U.S. commercial real estate market in profound ways; it is associated with sea-level rise, chronic flooding, more intense wildfires, increased energy load on urban assets and city power grids, accelerated asset degradation, air quality reduction and changing population migration patterns. As a result, understanding how real estate’s environmental performance affects its overall value is of great interest to commercial real estate valuations professionals and clients. Clients, most often lenders and investors, are looking for the correlation between environmental performance and higher or lower rents, operating costs, or capital costs.

However, a globally cohesive strategy to deal with negative climate externalities is not yet a reality, nor is a standard way to measure real estate’s value in the face of them. For instance, Cushman & Wakefield’s Valuation & Advisory colleagues in some European Union countries and the UK have robust criteria for assessing the environmental performance of real estate based on their governments’ legislative action, while U.S. appraisers and advisors face more of a challenge, lacking similar regulations.

In the meantime, U.S. Cushman & Wakefield Valuation & Advisory professionals are collaborating with global colleagues to continue to learn how ESG is being factored into investment considerations in other countries. We also expect more third-party data will be available in the medium-term. U.S. Cushman & Wakefield Valuation & Advisory Research Analysts are working to craft and compile climate risk-related information for our professionals and clients, including that presented in this report:

  1. Running the numbers on LEED-certified multifamily and office buildings
  2. Defining direct and indirect effects of climate change on assets
  3. Identifying possible future effects of climate change on assets
  4. Assessing insurance costs relative to regional climate risk
  5. Recommendations for future-proofing a portfolio

Note: Some of the information cited below is updated sporadically; the information includes the most recent available to Cushman & Wakefield.  

1. Running the numbers on LEED-certified multifamily and office buildings

Due to increased energy load on urban assets and city power grids, owners of urban assets will likely see cost increases in the short-term, which will place additional pressure on rents to cover those rising costs. Owners seeking space to fill their needs may therefore look to other markets where detrimental trends are not as prevalent and the costs to run those assets are not as high. This could translate to a shifting portfolio environment for asset managers.  

While some tenants may leave to save on energy costs, the majority that stay put will look for the most energy-efficient and cost-effective locations. Clients who seek updated assets that hold LEED certifications or similar certifications may not necessarily avoid the higher improvement costs in the near-term, but data indicates they are likely able to reap the long-term returns on a revenue per available square foot basis (RevPAF). RevPAF combines the effects of occupancy and rents into a single variable, and recent studies have found that higher rents more than make up for the marginally lower occupancy that LEED-certified assets experience. Cushman & Wakefield recently conducted an analysis in March 2022 for Gateway-Plus markets (defined as New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, San Jose and Washington, DC) aimed to discover any measurable premium for rents and revenue for LEED-certified multifamily assets. The analysis controlled for asset class (Class-A only) and quality while selecting CBD and urban submarkets consisting of 50 or more units, with a focus on rental and sales rates.  

The following graphs depict LEED-certified versus Non-certified Effective Rent Premiums and LEED-certified versus Non-certified RevPaF for multifamily properties from fourth quarter 2020 through fourth quarter 2021: 

U.S. CRE's Environmental Performance - LEED vs Non-certified Rent Premium
U.S. CRE's Environmental Performance - LEED vs Non-certified RevPAF 

 
2. Defining direct and indirect effects of climate change on assets

For the purposes of this discussion, we define direct effects from climate change on U.S. commercial real estate assets as effects immediately stemming from overall global warming. Examples of this include the increased number of severe climate events per year (i.e., an increased intensity of wildfires measured by an increased number of acres burned per event, increased number of hot days per year, or increased severity of hurricane events). This can be compared to indirect effects from climate change on U.S. commercial real estate assets, which we define as effects that result from the incidences that global warming causes. Examples of these include changes in human population migration patterns such as outmigration flows, increased demand on finite water sources, and reduction in air quality over time. As further discussed in the next section, both can have a profound influence on properties.  

Direct: Increased strain on urban center power grids due to more energy output required to operate assets is a direct negative effect on the U.S. commercial real estate market. A study performed by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) indicates a recent increase in the number of extreme heat days per year, which will continue to increase if no mitigation strategies are implemented. The study defines extreme heat as temperatures that “top 90°F, 100°F, or 105°F during future warm seasons.” The study also indicates that Sunbelt cities including Phoenix, AZ; Dallas, TX; Sarasota, FL; Memphis, TN; and Jackson, MS are most likely to be adversely impacted by an increase in extreme heat days per year. The top five warmest years recorded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) all occurred within the last decade—2016, 2020, 2019, 2015 and 2017, ranked in order from first to fifth hottest. In addition, NOAA predicts a rise of at least 2.1 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100. In August 2022, a study by The First Street Foundation, a national climate non-profit research organization, has identified an extreme heat belt that will develop in the next 20 to 30 years. This “belt” will range from the Gulf of Mexico, up to the Great Lakes and as far east as New Jersey and will result in large areas experiencing at least one day a year with a heat index over 125 degrees Fahrenheit.
Indirect: Outmigration due to the rising incidence of extreme weather events around the globe causes an indirect effect on the U.S. commercial real estate market due to the shift in population from one geographic location to another. This type of outmigration, known as disaster displacement, is defined by the Nansen Protection Agenda as situations where people are forced or obliged to leave their homes to avoid the effects of disasters triggered by natural hazards. Examples of extreme weather events that have a higher likelihood to cause outmigration flows are flooding and wildfires, as they leave heavy damage to individual properties and communities in their wake. Hurricane Katrina is the most notable example in recent history. According to the Data Center, an independent source on Southeast Louisiana, roughly 250,000 individuals (approximately 47.5% of New Orleans’ population) were displaced from New Orleans from August 2005 through July 2006. Furthermore, the current 2021 growth rate estimate of New Orleans has not been enough to bring the population back to pre-Katrina levels.
3. Identifying possible future effects of climate change on assets

While nationwide consensus has largely been reached regarding today’s rise in global temperatures and the direct link to human activity, future effects from that warming are still being discussed. This is especially true with the consequences that result from negative climate externalities, like changes in migration patterns, and more specifically, outmigration flows due to disaster displacement. 
Disaster displacement may happen less frequently than more direct effects like the growing number of hot days per year in certain metro areas, but this does not mean that their effects are any less detrimental. Referencing examples like Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the U.S. commercial real estate market could see a decrease in leasing velocity, an abrupt rise in vacancy and erosion of the talent pool in future disaster-affected areas. These represent a major long-term issue to commercial market fundamentals if the frequency of outmigration increases and could ultimately lead to national property portfolios being rebalanced or redrawn as a result.  

Not only do negative climate externalities like outmigration flows due to flooding add significant strain on commercial real estate fundamentals, but on their assets and operations as well, causing a negative collateral impact to a company’s image if they stall or stop for an extended period. While the accuracy of weather forecast models has improved greatly, allowing companies to proactively respond to extreme weather, it is inevitable that a weather event could be more damaging than expected. According to researchers from the University of Colorado, the incidence and intensity of these events is forecast to increase, meaning owners and occupiers of industrial properties will need to be proactive in implementing strategies that can help mitigate the risk (Bernstein, Asaf et al, 2018). 

Cities and Climate Change

In some cities where these adverse effects have occurred, steps have been taken to ensure that future risk of infrastructure damage is mitigated and that the above effects are minimized. After Hurricane Katrina devastated Louisiana in August 2005 and caused roughly $161 billion in damages, $15 billion in funding was approved for various mitigation projects. 

In September 2018, the city of Houston adopted a floodplain ordinance in response to Hurricane Harvey, which resulted in an estimated $125 billion in damages. The ordinance, known as Chapter 19 Code of Ordinance, requires new developments to be built 24 inches above the 500-year floodplain instead of 12 inches above the 100-year floodplain, and increases the mitigation fill requirements. 
Similarly, New York City has taken expansive measures to ensure devastation from events such as Hurricane Sandy in 2012 are properly addressed. The event caused approximately $70 billion in damages and has led to major steps to protect much of the city’s most valuable real estate, such as the Lower Manhattan Costal Resiliency (LMCR) project, and the Battery Park City Resiliency (BPCR) project. Representing billions of dollars in climate change mitigation efforts, the plans include floodwalls along the waterfront buried into the landscape, overhauls of stormwater infrastructure, and infrastructure improvements to piers, docks, water transportation terminals, and waterfront pedestrian access points. 

 

The SEC and Climate Change
 

Cities aren’t the only entities taking steps to ensure climate change is addressed for future years. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed a rule in late March 2022 that would require public companies to provide detailed disclosures about the level of climate-related risk they are exposed to; their climate-related risk management process; how their business model, financial performance, and future earnings outlook are likely to be affected; as well as the bottom-line financial impact of climate-related events they have experienced. Furthermore, the pending rule would require all public registrants to disclose their direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, any indirect GHGs, and any additional GHGs resulting from its value chain activities. 

 

4. Assessing insurance costs relative to regional climate risk

Location-specific environmental risk mapping through rankings allow investors to manage their portfolio of assets more efficiently where differing levels of risk are involved, and crucially, protect those assets with varying insurance policies based on that risk. As the incidence and severity of catastrophic weather events rises, so too does the cost of insurance policies in areas most likely to be affected by those events. According to data collected from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), costs of climate disasters in the four-year period of 2015 through 2018 totaled $500 billion, nearly double the $254 billion cost of the previous four-year period of 2011 through 2014. As the costs of property damages increase, the expectation is that insurance companies will pass the costs onto owners, which means owners need to be prepared to absorb any increases in insurance premiums passed down. Typically, costs of improvement have been mitigated through alternative capital sources, such as catastrophe bonds and recently, green bonds, which can serve to improve the green rating of owners’ portfolios while also allowing for potentially higher future cash flows.

After identifying that coverage costs for assets will be larger in higher-risk areas and outlining several methods to mitigate those costs over time, quantifying this risk for owners is the next step to keeping them and their portfolios protected. One way this can be achieved is to utilize risk analysis tools, such as a model portfolio analysis completed by Lockton Companies and National Real Estate Advisors, LLC. The analysis tool measured risks associated with disasters like inland flooding, tornadoes, and hurricanes (to include coastal storm surge), concluding that catastrophic risk from hurricanes is by far the greatest of these disasters, and that the metro area with the highest risk is Miami, with an average annual loss of $767,000.

The following table depicts a model portfolio that determines asset value and average annual loss based on risk exposure in various markets, as found by Lockton Companies and National Real Estate Advisors, LLC in 2017.



 
5. Recommendations for future-proofing a portfolio

While the effect of negative climate externalities on commercial real estate in the U.S. varies, market participants should continue to future-proof their portfolios.

Appendix:
European Union and UK Regulations and Approach
Read Now

 

Authors

Jim Morrissey (image)
Jim Morrissey

Senior Managing Director, V&A Research Lead
New York, United States


+1 (212) 713-6812 x336812

Download VCard

Andrei-Wood-Headshot
Andrei Wood

Research Analyst
Tampa, United States


Download VCard

Sustainability Insights

Climate Risk: REAL (E)STATE OF EMERGENCY
Insights • Sustainability

Climate Risk: Real (E)STATE OF EMERGENCY

Following the sobering assessment of climate risk by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the COP26 summit in Glasgow, in our latest report, Real (E)state of Emergency, we give our view on the impetus for the property industry across Asia Pacific to act.
Alton Wong • 2/7/2022
COP26
Insights • Industrial

Will APAC Become the Global Center of Carbon Trading?

On the 13th of November, COP26 delegates and negotiators achieved an agreement to establish rules for carbon markets around the globe. 
11/23/2021
Role of the City CArd (image)
Insights • Sustainability

The Role of Cities in Defining Our Environmental Future

To support that future, the urban ecosystem needs to be at the heart of urban and development planning. While some might argue that’s a constraint on development, it’s actually an opportunity.
Andrew Phipps • 6/3/2021

Interested in learning more?

Get in touch and we can assist with any additional information you need.

With your permission we and our partners would like to use cookies in order to access and record information and process personal data, such as unique identifiers and standard information sent by a device to ensure our website performs as expected, to develop and improve our products, and for advertising and insight purposes.

Alternatively click on More Options and select your preferences before providing or refusing consent. Some processing of your personal data may not require your consent, but you have a right to object to such processing.

You can change your preferences at any time by returning to this site or clicking on  Cookies

More Options
Agree and Close
These cookies ensure that our website performs as expected,for example website traffic load is balanced across our servers to prevent our website from crashing during particularly high usage.
These cookies allow our website to remember choices you make (such as your user name, language or the region you are in) and provide enhanced features. These cookies do not gather any information about you that could be used for advertising or remember where you have been on the internet.
These cookies allow us to work with our marketing partners to understand which ads or links you have clicked on before arriving on our website or to help us make our advertising more relevant to you.
Agree All
Reject All
SAVE SETTINGS